Untangling Scenario Terminology to Improve Exercise Ontology Across Domains

Abstract

Scenario-based research is widely used across disciplines, from emergency management and healthcare to military strategy and live-action role-playing (LARP). However, inconsistencies in terminology and reporting practices hinder clarity, replicability, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. This study addresses these challenges by developing a standardized glossary to improve scenario documentation in both academic research and professional practice. Using qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with nine professionals across six domains, the study identifies key terminological inconsistencies and categorizes essential scenario components into nine thematic groups, including scenario types, temporal dynamics, immersion mechanisms, and evaluation methods. The resulting glossary enhances clarity, fosters interdisciplinary communication, and supports methodological rigor, enabling more consistent and comparable scenario-based research. By providing a unified lexicon, this study bridges gaps between qualitative and quantitative approaches, facilitating knowledge transfer and improving replicability. Future research should focus on validating and refining the glossary through practical applications in multi-agency exercises and academic studies.